<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Retrospective Tax Archives - prosaicview</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.prosaicview.com/tag/retrospective-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/tag/retrospective-tax/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:59:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Government&#8217;s Tax Disputes</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/tax-disputes/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/tax-disputes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cairn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modi government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pranab Mukherjee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retrospective Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Removing the retrospective tax, while a good step, is not enough to solve the tax disputes problem The retrospective tax provision that the late Pranab Mukherjee had introduced as a clause buried in the fine print during while presenting the Union Budget in 2012-13 as Finance Minister in UPA II is finally being repealed. It [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/tax-disputes/">The Government&#8217;s Tax Disputes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/tax-disputes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vodafone-Idea Case: Don’t Miss the Woods for the Trees</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-vi-mess/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-vi-mess/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 05:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retrospective Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The troubles at Vi are huge. But they are actually just a symptom of the mess in the telecom industry which needs to be fixed. &#160; Vi – the Indian telecom giant formed by the merger of Vodafone India and the AV Birla group’s Idea Cellular in a $23 billion dollar deal in 2017 – [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/the-vi-mess/">Vodafone-Idea Case: Don’t Miss the Woods for the Trees</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-vi-mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
