<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>prosaicview</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.prosaicview.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2026 02:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Nonsensical GDP Debates</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-nonsensical-gdp-debates/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-nonsensical-gdp-debates/#comments</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 05:34:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GDP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media debates]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=401</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>I have followed with a lot of interest and now amusement the hysterical debates on television and social media platforms after Mr Subhash Chandra Garg, former finance secretary, pointed out in a television debate that the absolute nominal GDP figure (or GDP at current prices) for first quarter of FY26 had been revised sharply downwards [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/the-nonsensical-gdp-debates/">The Nonsensical GDP Debates</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-nonsensical-gdp-debates/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scorched Earth War</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/scorched-earth-war/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/scorched-earth-war/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 10:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[war]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Desalination Plants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nuclear Fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the US]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[West Asia]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=399</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>It is not clear how the term “scorched earth strategy” came about. Some point to war reporting by journalists who started using the phrase to describe the tactics of a certain US General in World War 2. Others say it is the English translation of the Chinese phrase jiaoutu zhengce – literally scorched earth policy [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/scorched-earth-war/">Scorched Earth War</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/scorched-earth-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Trump&#8217;s Tariff&#8217;s are not another 1991 moment for India</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/trumps-tariffs-are-not-another-1991-moment-for-india/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/trumps-tariffs-are-not-another-1991-moment-for-india/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 06:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Education]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=395</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>As US President Donald Trump’s Liberty Day tariff is introduced, several economic commentators have begun saying this is an opportunity for India, not unlike the 1991 balance-of-payments crisis it faced, which led to the economic reforms. The assumption here is that Trump’s Tariffs could force the Indian government to lower the import tariffs it has [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/trumps-tariffs-are-not-another-1991-moment-for-india/">Trump&#8217;s Tariff&#8217;s are not another 1991 moment for India</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/trumps-tariffs-are-not-another-1991-moment-for-india/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Abhijit Sen Passes Away</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/abhijit-sen-passes-away/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/abhijit-sen-passes-away/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Aug 2022 04:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=390</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Dr Abhijit Sen, renowned economist, former member of the Planning Commission, and the strongest votary of universal Public Distribution System passed away on Monday, 29 August 2022. He was 72. A renowned agricultural economist, he was the chairman of the Commission for Agricultural Costs and Prices set up by the A B Vajpayee government. The [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/abhijit-sen-passes-away/">Abhijit Sen Passes Away</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/abhijit-sen-passes-away/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Prosaicview Podcast on IBC</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-ibc/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-ibc/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2021 08:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Banking & Finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Insolvency Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NPAs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=386</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of The Prosaicview Podcast, Veena Sivaramakrishnan, partner, Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas and an expert on the insolvency law talks to Prosenjit Datta about the changes that have been proposed as well as the changes that she would like to see in the IBC. https://www.buzzsprout.com/1631632/episodes/9381350</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-ibc/">The Prosaicview Podcast on IBC</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-ibc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Government&#8217;s Tax Disputes</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/tax-disputes/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/tax-disputes/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2021 13:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cairn]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modi government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pranab Mukherjee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retrospective Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax Disputes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Taxes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Removing the retrospective tax, while a good step, is not enough to solve the tax disputes problem The retrospective tax provision that the late Pranab Mukherjee had introduced as a clause buried in the fine print during while presenting the Union Budget in 2012-13 as Finance Minister in UPA II is finally being repealed. It [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/tax-disputes/">The Government&#8217;s Tax Disputes</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/tax-disputes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Prosaicview Podcast on the OECD/G20 Tax Proposal</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-the-oecd-g20-tax-proposal/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-the-oecd-g20-tax-proposal/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2021 06:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the Prosaicview Podcast, I discuss the OECD/G20 tax proposal that 130 countries have broadly agreed on with Mr Rohinton Sidhwa, Partner, Deloitte India. We discuss its implications for India, the nuances of the various clauses and whether it will actually prevent big companies from reducing taxes using tax havens around the [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-the-oecd-g20-tax-proposal/">The Prosaicview Podcast on the OECD/G20 Tax Proposal</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-the-oecd-g20-tax-proposal/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vodafone-Idea Case: Don’t Miss the Woods for the Trees</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-vi-mess/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-vi-mess/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2021 05:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Retrospective Tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telecom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vodafone]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The troubles at Vi are huge. But they are actually just a symptom of the mess in the telecom industry which needs to be fixed. &#160; Vi – the Indian telecom giant formed by the merger of Vodafone India and the AV Birla group’s Idea Cellular in a $23 billion dollar deal in 2017 – [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/the-vi-mess/">Vodafone-Idea Case: Don’t Miss the Woods for the Trees</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-vi-mess/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>PSUs: The Right Questions and the Wrong Ones</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/psus-selling-the-family-silver/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/psus-selling-the-family-silver/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2021 07:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disinvestment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Sector Enterprises]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>The two most important questions are almost never asked when the decision to disinvest or privatise a PSU is taken Whenever any government in India announces its intention to privatise or otherwise dispose off any public sector enterprise (PSE), a heated debate starts off. The current target of trying to get Rs 1.75 lakh crore [&#8230;]</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/psus-selling-the-family-silver/">PSUs: The Right Questions and the Wrong Ones</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/psus-selling-the-family-silver/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Prosaicview Podcast on Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting</title>
		<link>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-business-responsibility-and-sustainability-reporting/</link>
					<comments>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-business-responsibility-and-sustainability-reporting/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prosenjit Datta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2021 14:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Podcasts]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.prosaicview.com/?p=372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>In this episode of the Prosaicview Podcast, I talk with Dr Inderjeet Singh, Director &#8211; Financial Advisory, Deloitte India about the new Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting (BRSR) norms that the top 1000 listed companies by market capitalisation will need to comply with as per the Securities and Exchange Board of India directive. https://www.buzzsprout.com/1631632/episodes/8960881</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-business-responsibility-and-sustainability-reporting/">The Prosaicview Podcast on Business Responsibility and Sustainability Reporting</a> appeared first on <a href="https://www.prosaicview.com">prosaicview</a>.</p>
]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://www.prosaicview.com/the-prosaicview-podcast-on-business-responsibility-and-sustainability-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
